cmliu/subscheck-win-gui vs mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse
mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, wavefunctioncollapse shows stronger maintenance signals than subscheck-win-gui. wavefunctioncollapse rates Mixed overall while subscheck-win-gui rates Concerns. subscheck-win-gui last saw a commit 1 year ago with 1+ active contributor, while wavefunctioncollapse last saw a commit 3 months ago with 14+ active contributors. subscheck-win-gui is MIT-licensed while wavefunctioncollapse is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cmliu/subscheck-win-gui →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
last commit was 1y ago; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| subscheck-win-gui | wavefunctioncollapse | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,451 | 25,036 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 3mo ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 72 | 8 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? cmliu/subscheck-win-gui · mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse
Ask AI about cmliu/subscheck-win-gui vs mxgmn/wavefunctioncollapse
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.