cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose vs ggerganov/ggwave
ggerganov/ggwave shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ggwave shows healthier maintenance signals than openpose. ggwave rates Healthy overall while openpose rates Mixed. openpose last saw a commit 1 year ago with 37+ active contributors, while ggwave last saw a commit 2 months ago with 11+ active contributors. openpose is Other-licensed while ggwave is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓37+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ggerganov/ggwave →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 86% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| openpose | ggwave | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 34,069 | 7,637 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 2mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 359 | 63 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 17% | 47% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose · ggerganov/ggwave
Ask AI about cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose vs ggerganov/ggwave
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.