cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose vs haoel/leetcode
cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, openpose shows stronger maintenance signals than leetcode. openpose rates Mixed overall while leetcode rates Concerns. openpose last saw a commit 1 year ago with 37+ active contributors, while leetcode last saw a commit 2 years ago with 8+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓37+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
haoel/leetcode →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓8 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.); 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| openpose | leetcode | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 34,069 | 18,052 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 2y ago |
| License | Other | — |
| Open issues | 359 | 55 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 17% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose · haoel/leetcode
Ask AI about cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose vs haoel/leetcode
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.