cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose vs sysown/proxysql
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, openpose and proxysql both show mixed maintenance signals. openpose last saw a commit 2 years ago with 37+ active contributors, while proxysql last saw a commit 4 months ago with 1+ active contributor. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; license evidence incomplete…
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; license evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ✓37+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
sysown/proxysql
Solo project — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| openpose | proxysql | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 34,069 | 6,729 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 4mo ago |
| License | Unknown | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 359 | 1,145 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 17% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose · sysown/proxysql
Ask AI about cmu-perceptual-computing-lab/openpose vs sysown/proxysql
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.