cockroachdb/pebble vs gin-gonic/gin
gin-gonic/gin shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, gin shows healthier maintenance signals than pebble. gin rates Healthy overall while pebble rates Mixed. pebble last saw a commit 4 months ago with 5+ active contributors, while gin last saw a commit 1 month ago with 44+ active contributors. pebble is BSD-3-Clause-licensed while gin is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cockroachdb/pebble
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 89% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
gin-gonic/gin
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓44+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 25% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| pebble | gin | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,875 | 89,099 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Open issues | 237 | 761 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 55% | 71% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? cockroachdb/pebble · gin-gonic/gin
Ask AI about cockroachdb/pebble vs gin-gonic/gin
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.