cocos2d/cocos2d-x vs lizardbyte/sunshine
lizardbyte/sunshine shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, sunshine shows healthier maintenance signals than cocos2d-x. sunshine rates Healthy overall while cocos2d-x rates Concerns. cocos2d-x last saw a commit 1 year ago with 17+ active contributors, while sunshine last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cocos2d/cocos2d-x →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 1y ago
no license — legally unclear; no tests detected
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 1y ago
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 26% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
lizardbyte/sunshine →
Healthy across the board
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 27% of recent commits)
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| cocos2d-x | sunshine | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,998 | 36,974 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 1,610 | 106 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 47% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? cocos2d/cocos2d-x · lizardbyte/sunshine
Ask AI about cocos2d/cocos2d-x vs lizardbyte/sunshine
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.