code52/carnac vs dotnet/roslyn
dotnet/roslyn shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, roslyn shows healthier maintenance signals than carnac. roslyn rates Healthy overall while carnac rates Mixed. carnac last saw a commit 3 years ago with 10+ active contributors, while roslyn last saw a commit 1 month ago with 13+ active contributors. carnac is MS-PL-licensed while roslyn is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
code52/carnac →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
non-standard license (MS-PL); last commit was 3y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (MS-PL) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MS-PL licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
dotnet/roslyn →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| carnac | roslyn | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,513 | 20,402 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MS-PL | MIT |
| Open issues | 171 | 6,214 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 1% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? code52/carnac · dotnet/roslyn
Ask AI about code52/carnac vs dotnet/roslyn
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.