RepoPilot

code52/carnac vs nickemanarin/screentogif

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, carnac and screentogif both show mixed maintenance signals. carnac last saw a commit 3 years ago with 10+ active contributors, while screentogif last saw a commit 2 months ago with 13+ active contributors. Both use the MS-PL license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

code52/carnac

Mixed

Stale — last commit 3y ago

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (MS-PL); last commit was 3y ago…

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 3y ago; no CI workflows detected

  • Stale — last commit 3y ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (MS-PL) — review terms
  • No CI workflows detected
  • 10 active contributors
  • MS-PL licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

nickemanarin/screentogif

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (MS-PL)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (MS-PL) — review terms
  • Last commit 2w ago
  • 13 active contributors
  • MS-PL licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

carnacscreentogif
Stars4,51326,910
Last commit3y ago2mo ago
LicenseMS-PLMS-PL
Open issues171320
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage1%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? code52/carnac · nickemanarin/screentogif

Ask AI about code52/carnac vs nickemanarin/screentogif

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.