codeeditapp/codeedit vs hyperoslo/cache
codeeditapp/codeedit shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, codeedit shows healthier maintenance signals than cache. codeedit rates Healthy overall while cache rates Mixed. codeedit last saw a commit 2 months ago with 22+ active contributors, while cache last saw a commit 10 months ago with 24+ active contributors. codeedit is MIT-licensed while cache is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
codeeditapp/codeedit →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
hyperoslo/cache →
Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
non-standard license (Other); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 8mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 54% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| codeedit | cache | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 22,843 | 3,141 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 10mo ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 197 | 12 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? codeeditapp/codeedit · hyperoslo/cache
Ask AI about codeeditapp/codeedit vs hyperoslo/cache
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.