codeeditapp/codeedit vs marginal/quicklookvideo
codeeditapp/codeedit shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, codeedit shows healthier maintenance signals than quicklookvideo. codeedit rates Healthy overall while quicklookvideo rates Mixed. codeedit last saw a commit 2 months ago with 22+ active contributors, while quicklookvideo last saw a commit 1 month ago with 3+ active contributors. codeedit is MIT-licensed while quicklookvideo is GPL-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
codeeditapp/codeedit →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
marginal/quicklookvideo →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓GPL-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| codeedit | quicklookvideo | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 22,843 | 3,400 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Open issues | 197 | 15 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? codeeditapp/codeedit · marginal/quicklookvideo
Ask AI about codeeditapp/codeedit vs marginal/quicklookvideo
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.