codeeditapp/codeedit vs ninxsoft/mist
codeeditapp/codeedit shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, codeedit shows healthier maintenance signals than mist. codeedit rates Healthy overall while mist rates Mixed. codeedit last saw a commit 2 months ago with 22+ active contributors, while mist last saw a commit 8 months ago with 1+ active contributor. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
codeeditapp/codeedit →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ninxsoft/mist →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| codeedit | mist | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 22,843 | 4,863 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 8mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 197 | 60 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? codeeditapp/codeedit · ninxsoft/mist
Ask AI about codeeditapp/codeedit vs ninxsoft/mist
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.