codehubapp/codehub vs kerryjiang/supersocket
kerryjiang/supersocket shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, supersocket shows healthier maintenance signals than codehub. supersocket rates Healthy overall while codehub rates Concerns. codehub last saw a commit 4 years ago with 5+ active contributors, while supersocket last saw a commit 2 months ago with 3+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
codehubapp/codehub →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 4y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 4y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 4y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓5 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.); 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
kerryjiang/supersocket →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| codehub | supersocket | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 22,625 | 4,220 |
| Last commit | 4y ago | 2mo ago |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 237 | 210 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 26% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? codehubapp/codehub · kerryjiang/supersocket
Ask AI about codehubapp/codehub vs kerryjiang/supersocket
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.