col-e/recaf vs conductor-oss/conductor
conductor-oss/conductor shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, conductor shows healthier maintenance signals than recaf. conductor rates Healthy overall while recaf rates Mixed. recaf last saw a commit 4 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while conductor was committed to 1 week ago with 20+ active contributors. recaf is MIT-licensed while conductor is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
col-e/recaf
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 93% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
conductor-oss/conductor
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 19% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| recaf | conductor | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 7,160 | 32,185 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 9d ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 83 | 258 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 42% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? col-e/recaf · conductor-oss/conductor
Ask AI about col-e/recaf vs conductor-oss/conductor
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.