col-e/recaf vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, recaf and disruptor both show mixed maintenance signals. recaf last saw a commit 4 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors. recaf is MIT-licensed while disruptor is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
col-e/recaf
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 93% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
lmax-exchange/disruptor
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| recaf | disruptor | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 7,160 | 18,326 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 83 | 17 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 41% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? col-e/recaf · lmax-exchange/disruptor
Ask AI about col-e/recaf vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.