RepoPilot

colinhacks/zod vs sinclairzx81/typebox

colinhacks/zod shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, zod shows healthier maintenance signals than typebox. zod rates Healthy overall while typebox rates Mixed. zod was committed to 3 weeks ago with 28+ active contributors, while typebox was committed to 4 weeks ago with 5+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

colinhacks/zod

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 65% of recent commits
  • Last commit today
  • 28+ active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

sinclairzx81/typebox

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

MixedDependency

top contributor handles 94% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 5 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

zodtypebox
Stars43,4996,917
Last commit27d ago28d ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues1157
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage66%100%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? colinhacks/zod · sinclairzx81/typebox

Ask AI about colinhacks/zod vs sinclairzx81/typebox

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.