RepoPilot

conductor-oss/conductor vs freeok/so-novel

conductor-oss/conductor shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, conductor shows healthier maintenance signals than so-novel. conductor rates Healthy overall while so-novel rates Mixed. conductor was committed to 1 week ago with 20+ active contributors, while so-novel last saw a commit 1 month ago with 3+ active contributors. conductor is Apache-2.0-licensed while so-novel is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

conductor-oss/conductor

Healthy

Strong maintenance signals

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 20 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 19% of recent commits)
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

freeok/so-novel

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 6w ago
  • 3 active contributors
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

conductorso-novel
Stars32,1858,037
Last commit9d ago1mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
Open issues25824
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage42%23%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeCC
Cycles00
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? conductor-oss/conductor · freeok/so-novel

Ask AI about conductor-oss/conductor vs freeok/so-novel

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.