conductor-oss/conductor vs macrozheng/springcloud-learning
conductor-oss/conductor shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, conductor shows healthier maintenance signals than springcloud-learning. conductor rates Healthy overall while springcloud-learning rates Concerns. conductor last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors, while springcloud-learning last saw a commit 1 year ago with 1+ active contributor. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
conductor-oss/conductor →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 14% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
macrozheng/springcloud-learning →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| conductor | springcloud-learning | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31,781 | 6,925 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 164 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 65% | 78% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? conductor-oss/conductor · macrozheng/springcloud-learning
Ask AI about conductor-oss/conductor vs macrozheng/springcloud-learning
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.