conductor-oss/conductor vs pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
conductor-oss/conductor shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, conductor shows healthier maintenance signals than pojavlauncher. conductor rates Healthy overall while pojavlauncher rates Mixed. conductor last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors, while pojavlauncher last saw a commit 9 months ago with 9+ active contributors. conductor is Apache-2.0-licensed while pojavlauncher is LGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
conductor-oss/conductor →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 14% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher →
Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
copyleft license (LGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
- ⚠LGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓LGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| conductor | pojavlauncher | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31,781 | 8,921 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 9mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 164 | 124 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 65% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? conductor-oss/conductor · pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
Ask AI about conductor-oss/conductor vs pojavlauncherteam/pojavlauncher
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.