conductor-oss/conductor vs seleniumhq/selenium
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, conductor and selenium both show healthy maintenance signals. conductor last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors, while selenium was committed to 3 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
conductor-oss/conductor →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 14% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
seleniumhq/selenium →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| conductor | selenium | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31,781 | 34,146 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 24d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 164 | 186 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 65% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? conductor-oss/conductor · seleniumhq/selenium
Ask AI about conductor-oss/conductor vs seleniumhq/selenium
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.