conductor-oss/conductor vs yalantis/ucrop
conductor-oss/conductor shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, conductor shows healthier maintenance signals than ucrop. conductor rates Healthy overall while ucrop rates Mixed. conductor was committed to 1 week ago with 20+ active contributors, while ucrop last saw a commit 1 year ago with 31+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
conductor-oss/conductor
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 19% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
yalantis/ucrop
Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
test evidence incomplete; CI evidence incomplete…
test evidence incomplete; CI evidence incomplete…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 9mo ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
- ✓Last commit 9mo ago
- ✓31+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| conductor | ucrop | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 32,185 | 12,090 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open issues | 258 | 330 |
| Has tests | ✓ | Unknown |
| Has CI | ✓ | Unknown |
| Test coverage | 42% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? conductor-oss/conductor · yalantis/ucrop
Ask AI about conductor-oss/conductor vs yalantis/ucrop
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.