coreybutler/nvm-windows vs halfrost/halfrost-field
coreybutler/nvm-windows shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, nvm-windows shows healthier maintenance signals than halfrost-field. nvm-windows rates Healthy overall while halfrost-field rates Mixed. nvm-windows last saw a commit 2 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while halfrost-field last saw a commit 2 years ago with 4+ active contributors. nvm-windows is MIT-licensed while halfrost-field is CC-BY-SA-4.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
coreybutler/nvm-windows →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
halfrost/halfrost-field →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (CC-BY-SA-4.0); last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-SA-4.0) — review terms
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓CC-BY-SA-4.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| nvm-windows | halfrost-field | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 46,264 | 13,213 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | CC-BY-SA-4.0 |
| Open issues | 83 | 3 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? coreybutler/nvm-windows · halfrost/halfrost-field
Ask AI about coreybutler/nvm-windows vs halfrost/halfrost-field
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.