RepoPilot

coreybutler/nvm-windows vs mightymoud/sidekick

coreybutler/nvm-windows shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, nvm-windows shows healthier maintenance signals than sidekick. nvm-windows rates Healthy overall while sidekick rates Mixed. nvm-windows last saw a commit 2 months ago with 14+ active contributors, while sidekick last saw a commit 4 months ago with 9+ active contributors. nvm-windows is MIT-licensed while sidekick is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

coreybutler/nvm-windows

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit 3w ago
  • 14 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

mightymoud/sidekick

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 3mo ago

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected…

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 84% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit 3mo ago
  • 9 active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

nvm-windowssidekick
Stars46,2647,351
Last commit2mo ago4mo ago
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
Open issues8317
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? coreybutler/nvm-windows · mightymoud/sidekick

Ask AI about coreybutler/nvm-windows vs mightymoud/sidekick

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.