coreybutler/nvm-windows vs v2ray/v2ray-core
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
coreybutler/nvm-windows →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
v2ray/v2ray-core →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| nvm-windows | v2ray-core | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 46,264 | 46,849 |
| Last commit | 27d ago | 21d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 83 | 18 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? coreybutler/nvm-windows · v2ray/v2ray-core
Ask AI about coreybutler/nvm-windows vs v2ray/v2ray-core
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.