cozodb/cozo vs spacejam/sled
spacejam/sled shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, sled shows healthier maintenance signals than cozo. sled rates Healthy overall while cozo rates Mixed. cozo last saw a commit 1 year ago with 15+ active contributors, while sled last saw a commit 5 months ago with 3+ active contributors. cozo is MPL-2.0-licensed while sled is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cozodb/cozo
Stale — last commit 2y ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 72% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓MPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
spacejam/sled
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| cozo | sled | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,104 | 9,084 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 5mo ago |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 50 | 172 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 9% | 81% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | A | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? cozodb/cozo · spacejam/sled
Ask AI about cozodb/cozo vs spacejam/sled
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.