crablang/crab vs rtk-ai/rtk
rtk-ai/rtk shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, rtk shows healthier maintenance signals than crab. rtk rates Healthy overall while crab rates Mixed. crab last saw a commit 1 year ago with 25+ active contributors, while rtk last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors. crab is Other-licensed while rtk is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
crablang/crab →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓25+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 25% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
rtk-ai/rtk →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 63% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| crab | rtk | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,091 | 43,729 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 4 | 829 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 12% | 21% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? crablang/crab · rtk-ai/rtk
Ask AI about crablang/crab vs rtk-ai/rtk
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.