crmne/ruby_llm vs hashicorp/vagrant
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, ruby_llm and vagrant both show mixed maintenance signals. ruby_llm was committed to 1 week ago with 6+ active contributors, while vagrant was committed to 2 weeks ago with 19+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
crmne/ruby_llm
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 94% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
hashicorp/vagrant
Evidence incomplete — review before adopting
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; license evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ruby_llm | vagrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,337 | 27,206 |
| Last commit | 12d ago | 14d ago |
| License | MIT | Unknown |
| Open issues | 12 | 751 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 56% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? crmne/ruby_llm · hashicorp/vagrant
Ask AI about crmne/ruby_llm vs hashicorp/vagrant
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.