crossoverjie/jcsprout vs ripmeapp/ripme
ripmeapp/ripme shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ripme shows healthier maintenance signals than jcsprout. ripme rates Healthy overall while jcsprout rates Mixed. jcsprout last saw a commit 2 years ago with 7+ active contributors, while ripme last saw a commit 8 months ago with 12+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
crossoverjie/jcsprout →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 91% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ripmeapp/ripme →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 86% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| jcsprout | ripme | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 26,941 | 4,074 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 8mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 45 | 531 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 40% | 86% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? crossoverjie/jcsprout · ripmeapp/ripme
Ask AI about crossoverjie/jcsprout vs ripmeapp/ripme
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.