crossoverjie/jcsprout vs roughike/bottombar
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, jcsprout and bottombar both show mixed maintenance signals. jcsprout last saw a commit 2 years ago with 7+ active contributors, while bottombar last saw a commit 5 years ago with 12+ active contributors. jcsprout is MIT-licensed while bottombar is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
crossoverjie/jcsprout
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 91% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
roughike/bottombar
Stale — last commit 5y ago
last commit was 5y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 82% of recent commits
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| jcsprout | bottombar | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 26,941 | 8,362 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 5y ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 45 | 275 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 40% | 21% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? crossoverjie/jcsprout · roughike/bottombar
Ask AI about crossoverjie/jcsprout vs roughike/bottombar
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.