cure53/dompurify vs mdx-js/mdx
mdx-js/mdx shows stronger signals overall
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
cure53/dompurify →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
worst of 4 axesnon-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
Show 4 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 70% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
What would change the summary?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
mdx-js/mdx →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| dompurify | mdx | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 16,975 | 19,478 |
| Last commit | 6d ago | 7d ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 5 | 24 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 83% | 43% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? cure53/dompurify · mdx-js/mdx
Ask AI about cure53/dompurify vs mdx-js/mdx
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.