d2l-ai/d2l-zh vs shadowsocks/shadowsocks
d2l-ai/d2l-zh shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, d2l-zh shows stronger maintenance signals than shadowsocks. d2l-zh rates Mixed overall while shadowsocks rates Concerns. d2l-zh last saw a commit 1 year ago with 17+ active contributors, while shadowsocks last saw a commit 2 years ago with 1+ active contributor. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
d2l-ai/d2l-zh →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
shadowsocks/shadowsocks →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.); 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| d2l-zh | shadowsocks | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 77,727 | 33,591 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 2y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 126 | 450 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? d2l-ai/d2l-zh · shadowsocks/shadowsocks
Ask AI about d2l-ai/d2l-zh vs shadowsocks/shadowsocks
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.