d2l-ai/d2l-zh vs sjmoran/deeplpf-image-enhancement
d2l-ai/d2l-zh shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, d2l-zh shows stronger maintenance signals than deeplpf-image-enhancement. d2l-zh rates Mixed overall while deeplpf-image-enhancement rates Concerns. d2l-zh last saw a commit 1 year ago with 17+ active contributors, while deeplpf-image-enhancement last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
d2l-ai/d2l-zh →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
sjmoran/deeplpf-image-enhancement →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 64% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓4 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| d2l-zh | deeplpf-image-enhancement | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 77,727 | 257 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 126 | 1 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? d2l-ai/d2l-zh · sjmoran/deeplpf-image-enhancement
Ask AI about d2l-ai/d2l-zh vs sjmoran/deeplpf-image-enhancement
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.