daimajia/numberprogressbar vs yuliskov/smarttube
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, numberprogressbar and smarttube both show mixed maintenance signals. numberprogressbar last saw a commit 5 years ago with 11+ active contributors, while smarttube was committed to 1 week ago with 8+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
daimajia/numberprogressbar
Stale — last commit 6y ago
last commit was 6y ago; test evidence incomplete…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 6y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 6y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yuliskov/smarttube
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| numberprogressbar | smarttube | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,092 | 32,681 |
| Last commit | 5y ago | 9d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 29 | 698 |
| Has tests | Unknown | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 28% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? daimajia/numberprogressbar · yuliskov/smarttube
Ask AI about daimajia/numberprogressbar vs yuliskov/smarttube
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.