dani-garcia/vaultwarden vs passbolt/passbolt_api
dani-garcia/vaultwarden shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, vaultwarden shows healthier maintenance signals than passbolt_api. vaultwarden rates Healthy overall while passbolt_api rates Mixed. vaultwarden was committed to 1 week ago with 30+ active contributors, while passbolt_api was committed to 5 days ago with 9+ active contributors. Both use the AGPL-3.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
dani-garcia/vaultwarden
Strong maintenance signals
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 33% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
passbolt/passbolt_api
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no CI workflows detected…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 56% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| vaultwarden | passbolt_api | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 67,241 | 6,115 |
| Last commit | 7d ago | 5d ago |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 77 | 26 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | No |
| Test coverage | 30% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? dani-garcia/vaultwarden · passbolt/passbolt_api
Ask AI about dani-garcia/vaultwarden vs passbolt/passbolt_api
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.