RepoPilot

danielzeller/depth-lib-android- vs proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, depth-lib-android- and proxyee-down both show mixed maintenance signals. depth-lib-android- last saw a commit 1 year ago with 9+ active contributors, while proxyee-down last saw a commit 1 year ago with 7+ active contributors. depth-lib-android- is Other-licensed while proxyee-down is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

danielzeller/depth-lib-android-

Mixed

Stale — last commit 2y ago

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • 9 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 28% of recent commits)
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down

Mixed

Stale — last commit 2y ago

ConcernsDependency

last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No test directory detected
  • 7 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

depth-lib-android-proxyee-down
Stars4,53524,751
Last commit1y ago1y ago
LicenseOtherApache-2.0
Open issues11214
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage10%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? danielzeller/depth-lib-android- · proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down

Ask AI about danielzeller/depth-lib-android- vs proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.