dapperlib/dapper vs jasontaylordev/cleanarchitecture
jasontaylordev/cleanarchitecture shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, cleanarchitecture shows healthier maintenance signals than dapper. cleanarchitecture rates Healthy overall while dapper rates Mixed. dapper last saw a commit 1 month ago with 26+ active contributors, while cleanarchitecture last saw a commit 1 month ago with 3+ active contributors. dapper is Other-licensed while cleanarchitecture is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
dapperlib/dapper →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 65% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
jasontaylordev/cleanarchitecture →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 56% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| dapper | cleanarchitecture | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 18,284 | 20,031 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 544 | 18 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 62% | 55% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? dapperlib/dapper · jasontaylordev/cleanarchitecture
Ask AI about dapperlib/dapper vs jasontaylordev/cleanarchitecture
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.