RepoPilot

daybreak-u/chineseocr_lite vs lizardbyte/sunshine

lizardbyte/sunshine shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, sunshine shows healthier maintenance signals than chineseocr_lite. sunshine rates Healthy overall while chineseocr_lite rates Mixed. chineseocr_lite last saw a commit 1 month ago with 12+ active contributors, while sunshine last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors. chineseocr_lite is GPL-2.0-licensed while sunshine is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

daybreak-u/chineseocr_lite

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; no CI workflows detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected

  • GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1w ago
  • 12 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
  • GPL-2.0 licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

lizardbyte/sunshine

Healthy

Healthy across the board

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 18 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 27% of recent commits)
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

chineseocr_litesunshine
Stars12,30636,974
Last commit1mo ago1mo ago
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-3.0
Open issues260106
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage100%47%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeA
Cycles0
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? daybreak-u/chineseocr_lite · lizardbyte/sunshine

Ask AI about daybreak-u/chineseocr_lite vs lizardbyte/sunshine

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.