daybreak-u/chineseocr_lite vs thealgorithms/c-plus-plus
thealgorithms/c-plus-plus shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, c-plus-plus shows healthier maintenance signals than chineseocr_lite. c-plus-plus rates Healthy overall while chineseocr_lite rates Mixed. chineseocr_lite last saw a commit 1 month ago with 12+ active contributors, while c-plus-plus last saw a commit 8 months ago with 34+ active contributors. chineseocr_lite is GPL-2.0-licensed while c-plus-plus is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
daybreak-u/chineseocr_lite →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
- ✓GPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
thealgorithms/c-plus-plus →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| chineseocr_lite | c-plus-plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12,306 | 34,206 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 8mo ago |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 260 | 33 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 1% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? daybreak-u/chineseocr_lite · thealgorithms/c-plus-plus
Ask AI about daybreak-u/chineseocr_lite vs thealgorithms/c-plus-plus
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.