RepoPilot

ddddxxx/lyricsx vs jordanbaird/ice

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, lyricsx and ice both show mixed maintenance signals. lyricsx last saw a commit 9 months ago with 3+ active contributors, while ice last saw a commit 9 months ago with 4+ active contributors. lyricsx is MPL-2.0-licensed while ice is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

ddddxxx/lyricsx

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 7mo ago

MixedDependency

top contributor handles 98% of recent commits; no tests detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
  • Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit 7mo ago
  • 3 active contributors
  • MPL-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency MixedHealthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

jordanbaird/ice

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 8mo ago

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 95% of recent commits…

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
  • Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
  • GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit 8mo ago
  • 4 active contributors
  • GPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

lyricsxice
Stars5,16427,835
Last commit9mo ago9mo ago
LicenseMPL-2.0GPL-3.0
Open issues306389
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? ddddxxx/lyricsx · jordanbaird/ice

Ask AI about ddddxxx/lyricsx vs jordanbaird/ice

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.