deepseek-ai/flashmla vs tensorflow/tensorflow
deepseek-ai/flashmla shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, flashmla shows healthier maintenance signals than tensorflow. flashmla rates Healthy overall while tensorflow rates Mixed. flashmla last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors, while tensorflow was committed to 5 days ago with 47+ active contributors. flashmla is MIT-licensed while tensorflow is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
deepseek-ai/flashmla
Strong maintenance signals
no CI workflows detected; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 28% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
tensorflow/tensorflow
Open vulnerabilities flagged by OpenSSF Scorecard
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: known vulnerabilities detected (scored 0/10 by OpenSSF)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓47+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| flashmla | tensorflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 12,876 | 199,715 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 5d ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 123 | 3,107 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | No | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 22% | 24% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? deepseek-ai/flashmla · tensorflow/tensorflow
Ask AI about deepseek-ai/flashmla vs tensorflow/tensorflow
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.