deskflow/deskflow vs tencent/ncnn
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, deskflow and ncnn both show mixed maintenance signals. deskflow was committed to 1 week ago with 21+ active contributors, while ncnn last saw a commit 4 months ago with 18+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
deskflow/deskflow
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected in the complete Git tree…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 57% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓GPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
tencent/ncnn
Evidence incomplete — review before adopting
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
license evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ⚠Could not verify license from the available repository evidence
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| deskflow | ncnn | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 28,602 | 23,199 |
| Last commit | 8d ago | 4mo ago |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open issues | 200 | 1,186 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 7% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? deskflow/deskflow · tencent/ncnn
Ask AI about deskflow/deskflow vs tencent/ncnn
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.