devtoys-app/devtoys vs facepunch/sbox-public
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, devtoys and sbox-public both show healthy maintenance signals. devtoys last saw a commit 4 months ago with 13+ active contributors, while sbox-public last saw a commit 1 month ago with 15+ active contributors. devtoys is MIT-licensed while sbox-public is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
devtoys-app/devtoys →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 87% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
facepunch/sbox-public →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 17% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| devtoys | sbox-public | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31,443 | 6,146 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 330 | 2,361 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 1% | 12% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? devtoys-app/devtoys · facepunch/sbox-public
Ask AI about devtoys-app/devtoys vs facepunch/sbox-public
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.