devtoys-app/devtoys vs richasy/bili.uwp
devtoys-app/devtoys shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, devtoys shows healthier maintenance signals than bili.uwp. devtoys rates Healthy overall while bili.uwp rates Mixed. devtoys last saw a commit 4 months ago with 13+ active contributors, while bili.uwp last saw a commit 2 years ago with 9+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
devtoys-app/devtoys →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 87% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
richasy/bili.uwp →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; top contributor handles 90% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| devtoys | bili.uwp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31,443 | 8,221 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 330 | 199 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 1% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? devtoys-app/devtoys · richasy/bili.uwp
Ask AI about devtoys-app/devtoys vs richasy/bili.uwp
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.