dioxuslabs/dioxus vs emilk/egui
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, dioxus and egui both show healthy maintenance signals. dioxus was committed to 2 weeks ago with 40+ active contributors, while egui was committed to 2 weeks ago with 34+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
dioxuslabs/dioxus
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓40+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
emilk/egui
Strong maintenance signals
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 39% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| dioxus | egui | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 38,940 | 30,332 |
| Last commit | 15d ago | 15d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 761 | 1,137 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 30% | 70% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 4 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? dioxuslabs/dioxus · emilk/egui
Ask AI about dioxuslabs/dioxus vs emilk/egui
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.