disintegration/imaging vs pocketbase/pocketbase
pocketbase/pocketbase shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, pocketbase shows healthier maintenance signals than imaging. pocketbase rates Healthy overall while imaging rates Mixed. imaging last saw a commit 2 years ago with 13+ active contributors, while pocketbase last saw a commit 1 month ago with 1+ active contributor. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
disintegration/imaging →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 65% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
pocketbase/pocketbase →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| imaging | pocketbase | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,719 | 58,210 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 34 | 17 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 22% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? disintegration/imaging · pocketbase/pocketbase
Ask AI about disintegration/imaging vs pocketbase/pocketbase
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.