dnspy/dnspy vs jamesmh/coravel
jamesmh/coravel shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, coravel shows healthier maintenance signals than dnspy. coravel rates Healthy overall while dnspy rates Concerns. dnspy last saw a commit 5 years ago with 7+ active contributors, while coravel last saw a commit 11 months ago with 19+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
dnspy/dnspy →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 5y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 5y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 5y ago
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
jamesmh/coravel →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 69% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 10mo ago
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| dnspy | coravel | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29,364 | 4,279 |
| Last commit | 5y ago | 11mo ago |
| License | — | MIT |
| Open issues | 185 | 83 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? dnspy/dnspy · jamesmh/coravel
Ask AI about dnspy/dnspy vs jamesmh/coravel
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.