docmost/docmost vs requarks/wiki
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, docmost and wiki both show mixed maintenance signals. docmost was committed to 4 days ago with 3+ active contributors, while wiki was committed to today with 30+ active contributors. Both use the AGPL-3.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
docmost/docmost
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 88% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
requarks/wiki
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠2 moderate-severity advisories on direct dependencies
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| docmost | wiki | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21,700 | 28,934 |
| Last commit | 4d ago | today |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 329 | 183 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 3% | 1% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 2 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? docmost/docmost · requarks/wiki
Ask AI about docmost/docmost vs requarks/wiki
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.