dotnet/maui vs javscraper/emby.plugins.javscraper
dotnet/maui shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, maui shows healthier maintenance signals than emby.plugins.javscraper. maui rates Healthy overall while emby.plugins.javscraper rates Concerns. maui last saw a commit 1 month ago with 29+ active contributors, while emby.plugins.javscraper last saw a commit 1 year ago with 6+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
dotnet/maui →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Scorecard: dangerous CI workflow (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓29+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 19% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
javscraper/emby.plugins.javscraper →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓6 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.); 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| maui | emby.plugins.javscraper | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 23,256 | 3,766 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | — |
| Open issues | 4,027 | 276 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? dotnet/maui · javscraper/emby.plugins.javscraper
Ask AI about dotnet/maui vs javscraper/emby.plugins.javscraper
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.