dotnet/maui vs shadowsocksr-backup/shadowsocksr-csharp
dotnet/maui shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, maui shows healthier maintenance signals than shadowsocksr-csharp. maui rates Healthy overall while shadowsocksr-csharp rates Mixed. maui last saw a commit 1 month ago with 29+ active contributors, while shadowsocksr-csharp last saw a commit 7 years ago with 2+ active contributors. maui is MIT-licensed while shadowsocksr-csharp is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
dotnet/maui →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Scorecard: dangerous CI workflow (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓29+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 19% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
shadowsocksr-backup/shadowsocksr-csharp →
Stale — last commit 7y ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 7y ago…
no CI workflows detected; no description (proxy for README missing)…
no description (proxy for README missing); last commit was 7y ago
last commit was 7y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 7y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: wire up GitHub Actions or equivalent
- →Learn from Mixed → Healthy if: add a README + repo description
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| maui | shadowsocksr-csharp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 23,256 | 4,511 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 7y ago |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 4,027 | 10 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? dotnet/maui · shadowsocksr-backup/shadowsocksr-csharp
Ask AI about dotnet/maui vs shadowsocksr-backup/shadowsocksr-csharp
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.