dotnet/roslyn vs klocman/bulk-crap-uninstaller
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, roslyn and bulk-crap-uninstaller both show healthy maintenance signals. roslyn last saw a commit 1 month ago with 13+ active contributors, while bulk-crap-uninstaller last saw a commit 3 months ago with 15+ active contributors. roslyn is MIT-licensed while bulk-crap-uninstaller is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
dotnet/roslyn →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
klocman/bulk-crap-uninstaller →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| roslyn | bulk-crap-uninstaller | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 20,402 | 19,059 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 3mo ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 6,214 | 161 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? dotnet/roslyn · klocman/bulk-crap-uninstaller
Ask AI about dotnet/roslyn vs klocman/bulk-crap-uninstaller
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.