dotnet/roslyn vs scighost/starward
dotnet/roslyn shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, roslyn shows healthier maintenance signals than starward. roslyn rates Healthy overall while starward rates Mixed. roslyn last saw a commit 1 month ago with 13+ active contributors, while starward last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
dotnet/roslyn →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
scighost/starward →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 92% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| roslyn | starward | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 20,402 | 4,379 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 6,214 | 133 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? dotnet/roslyn · scighost/starward
Ask AI about dotnet/roslyn vs scighost/starward
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.